June 4, 2009
Firing Back at Critics of a Watchdog's 'Arrogant' Report
Presumptuous. Arrogant. Orwellian. Such epithets have been hurled at the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy in response to its report, Criteria for Philanthropy at Its Best. The report was an attempt by the 30-year-old watchdog group to set benchmarks by which foundations could measure their progress in serving minorities, solving social problems, and improving their governance and accountability. (Disclosure: I am a board member of the National Committee for Responsive
This content is only for subscribers. You can gain access by purchasing a:
Print Subscription
Digital Subscription
Already have an account? Log In Now.
Get more great stories about the nonprofit world delivered to your inbox every weekday. 
