Previous

Economist Urges Charities to Get Ready for the Economic Recovery and a Brighter 2015

Next

Economy Still at Top of Fund Raisers' Worries, Survey Finds

April 12, 2010, 01:47 PM ET

What Makes Donors Give: a New Study Offers Clues

Baltimore

Affluent donors, and those with more years of education, are more likely to be motivated to give to causes that allow them to "make the world a better place," rather than to groups that meet basic needs, according to a new study whose results were presented here today at the annual meeting of the Association of Fundraising Professionals.

That was a key finding of a study of 10,000 Americans whose results were summarized in a speech here by Una Osili, director of research at the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. The study was sponsored by CCS, a fund-raising consulting firm.

The study examined motivations to give among people in different regions of the country as well as examining those who had similar ages, education levels, and incomes.

When all the donors in the study were examined together, nearly 18 percent said they made charitable gifts to meet basic needs, while 16.6 percent said they wanted to make the world a better place and 12.5 percent said they wanted to make local communities better.

While donors' geographic regions did not appear to influence basic charitable motivations, their ages, incomes, and education levels all did.

Donors with more years of formal education and those whose household incomes were $100,000 or more, for example, were more likely to give to make the world better and less likely to be interested in meeting basic needs. The same was true of younger donors.

Donors with a high-school degree or less were more frequently motivated to meet basic needs and to respond to the idea of the poor helping themselves, Ms. Osili said. Donors with higher incomes, she said, are more concerned with making the world better by making a measurable difference in solving stubborn social problems or preventing them from taking root in the first place.

  • Print
  • Comment (6)

Comments

1. mrgfmrgf - April 13, 2010 at 11:01 pm

What does this sentence mean?

Donors with higher incomes, she said, are more concerned with making the world better by making a measurable difference than in solving stubborn social problems or preventing them from taking root in the first place.

2. shybear309 - April 13, 2010 at 11:11 pm

I agree. The terms were not very well defined. I don't know whether it was the speaker, the research or the reporter. How is solving a stubborn social problem or preventing one from happening not making the world a better place?

3. fwendt - April 14, 2010 at 09:01 am


Confusing conclusions!
30.5% wanted to meet basic needs.....and make their local communities better, while 16.6% presumably wanted to make the
world a better place (perhaps byconcentrating on assistance to
under developed nations?).
That's 47.1% of the total. What was the attitude of the remaining
52.9%.

4. wegsman - April 14, 2010 at 11:04 am

It seems to me the difference is one of semantics. Presented with a request to make a distinction between the two, people with more education would be more likely to choose the more expansive wording "make the world a better place," while those with less education choose the more concrete "meet basic needs." But is there a real difference? I wonder. Did the researchers ask questions to determine what the respondents understood these phrases to mean?

5. megrace - April 14, 2010 at 12:01 pm

Hmmm. Seems to be an example of research disconnecting itself from flesh and blood and serving up convoluted platitutdes.

6. sals1801 - April 14, 2010 at 01:47 pm

I suspect this is the same report that was sponsored by the Bank of America, a study of High-Net Worth Philanthropy and researched by the Center of Philanthropy at Indiana University in 2006, and updated in 2008. Try going to www.bankofamerica/portraits to see the complete results. In any case the Chronicle of Philanthropy should have provided a link to the study, whatever the source.

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.