The Internal Revenue Service is not backing away from its controversial efforts to promote good governance by charities, according to its top nonprofit regulator.
The federal tax code does not explicitly set out governance standards for the IRS to enforce, but the tax agency in the past two years has been keeping an eye on charities’ governance practices — a move that has drawn criticism from some observers.
Sarah Hall Ingram, in remarks to a conference in Washington on Wednesday, noted that some people believe the IRS “should just be sticking to the [tax] code and the exact words of the code and get out of the governance business.”
Instead, she said, “we are in this discussion to stay.”
Not ‘Off the Hook’
Even with state oversight of nonprofit groups and self-regulation by charities, Ms. Ingram said, “Congress is not going to let the IRS off the hook for its job of regulating the [nonprofit] sector and ensuring that the sector is not only equipped to do the deeds that it sets out to do but also that the federal tax subsidy is used correctly.”
Ms. Ingram said she views good governance practices “as being all about risk management,” both for charities and for the IRS.
“I won’t say everybody agrees with me, but it’s pretty obvious to me that if [a charity] has safeguards, checks and balances, sound procedures in place, the likelihood of the organization getting in trouble is reduced,” she said. “If you aren’t paying attention, the likelihood that something accidental or otherwise could go wrong, or a bad actor could get in and mess around with the organization — the risks are higher.”
Ms. Ingram said that “in these economic times, it’s important not only to do good governance to keep from getting in trouble, to keep from wasting resources that you could spend on mission, but it’s also important not to take hard times and cut corners on governance. So in these times when we’re all tightening our belts, good governance has still got to have a place in your organization.”
Policies and Procedures
While no one set of governance principles fits all charities, said Ms. Ingram, “I continue to believe strongly that this is one of the key topics that every board, every organization, must keep on its agenda.” She added that “building procedures and habits into the fabric of the organization actually makes it less expensive, less alarming, and less disruptive.”
Ms. Ingram said she was pleased by a recent survey by Grant Thornton, an accounting and business advisory group, that showed a sharply increased focus on governance matters by nonprofit groups in 2009. Grant Thornton attributed the trend in part to the IRS’s revised Form 990 informational tax return for the 2008 tax year that includes new questions for charities about governance and oversight.
“That heartens me,” said Ms. Ingram, who noted “the general intense push for transparency across not just the nonprofit sector but the profit sector and Wall Street — you name it.”
The IRS is not auditing charities for their governance practices, Ms. Ingram said, but is using charities’ answers to governance questions on the Form 990 to help “target and calibrate our level of attention” to nonprofit groups.
“If we look at the 990 and we see no, or very lax, governance practices, procedures, and answers, then we’re going to worry more,” she said.
Ms. Ingram spoke at a seminar on “Top Issues in Nonprofit Governance” that was co-sponsored by the IRS and Independent Sector, a national coalition of charities and foundations. The seminar was held through Georgetown University Law Center’s Continuing Legal Education Program.


2 Responses to IRS Continues Its Focus on Governance Matters, Official Says
dclark - April 22, 2010 at 4:52 pm
Ron, this is what we’re talking about
herbpaine - April 22, 2010 at 5:40 pm
Ms. Ingram’s remarks are very timely and coincidentally align with my recent articles on the need to retrack governance in nonprofit organizations, most notably yesterday’s blog that posed the following question: Has the time come for a higher level of regulation of nonprofits?Recent stories from Texas (http://bit.ly/bkgApV) and the New York Times (http://nyti.ms/aYiWkJ) regarding alleged corruption by nonprofit leaders of a family service agency and a regional theatre, regrettably, are not new. Perhaps, they are anomalies, isolated events, and reflective of errant behavior in difficult economic times. Indeed, readers should be cautioned not to apply a broad brush to all nonprofits because of the deviations of a few. In any case, there is no excuse for violating the public trust.That such violations occur at all is in part a reflection of the failure of governance or, at the least, the inadequacy of boards of directors to ensure effective oversight and stewardship.For many years, a debate within the nonprofit sector and among attorneys general and legislators has roiled about the degree to which the nonprofit sector should be better regulated. The nonprofit sector has recoiled at the notion of regulation and its associated costs and has claimed that it can self-regulate.Can it?For more, go to http://bit.ly/dAYui1.