• May 22, 2013

Previous

Next

How Nonprofits Can Avoid a Cash Crisis

January 12, 2011, 10:38 pm

As a teenager, I was a paperboy, delivering copies of the Daily Homes News in my neighborhood.

It was well known in my small town that paperboys were flush with cash every Thursday, since Thursday was the day that we collected subscription dues on our routes. And, like clockwork, my friend Tommy would approach me every Thursday to borrow “some change” to purchase pastries from the corner store.

When Tommy’s tab hit a certain level, I would approach him to try to collect his debt. And whenever I approached him, his response was, “as long as I owe you, you’ll never go broke.”

I share this story because many of our nonprofits are operating with the notion that if their balance sheets contain some level of accounts receivable, they cannot go broke.

After all, those receivables will eventually become cash—someday.

But this is a dangerous mind-set. In actuality, a nonprofit with an aging list of accounts receivable runs the risk of overstating its net worth and facing a cash crisis. It also runs a serious risk of insolvency.

What’s more, nonprofits with aging accounts receivable may find themselves tapping into restricted funds, slashing staff salaries, and cutting jobs; or delaying making their own debt payments to get by.

Nonprofits that rely on government money are among those most at risk of facing these challenges. I’ve heard a number of nonprofit leaders say, “Government funders may pay slowly, but the money is guaranteed to come.” Well, this isn’t exactly true all of the time. We know of organizations that have gone out of business because municipal and state governments have been slow to pay.

Human-service groups are particularly vulnerable to slow-paying government contracts. In many cases, these groups are not prepared to withstand late payments, as they tend to operate on narrow margins and lack adequate cash reserves.

Nonprofits that are considering working with government or that are looking at other new sources of support should be prepared to handle the problem of late payments. The following is a partial list of what they should consider when setting up new financial arrangements:

• Evaluate the terms of payment.

• Reach out to other nonprofits that have experience with the government agency or grant-making organization that is offering support to get the scoop on how timely it is in making payments.

• Assess your organization’s balance sheet to determine your ability to withstand late payments with available cash.

• Evaluate your group’s access to working capital: Does your organization have a line of credit to meet current and projected needs or will it qualify for a line of credit if it needs one?

• Project cash flow regularly, and establish contingency plans if payments do not occur as planned.

Summoning the courage to just say no to a grant or contract may be the best thing an organization can do to ensure its financial viability—especially if the group is not flush with cash. Preemptively making these kinds of tough financial and organizational decisions may prevent an organization from going broke so it can remain in the business of serving the public good.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to How Nonprofits Can Avoid a Cash Crisis

bill__huddleston - January 13, 2011 at 4:19 pm

Another advantage of workplace giving is the predictablity of the funds, once the distribution period starts.

For example, in the Combined Federal Campaign, the solicitation period is in the fall of each year (sometime between Sept 1st and Dec 16 in general, although it can be extended). For exmployees who chose payroll deduction (the majority do) the deductions start with their January paycheck, and for the CFC charities the distribution period starts on April 1st. So a non-profit will know in April how much income they will get from April to March 31st of the next year, which is extremely valuable from a cash flow management perspective. There can be some flucuation due to people leaving or retiring, but this is usually not more than about 5 percent.

The other huge benefit of workplace giving funds (not just CFC) is that they are unrestricted.

Many local CFC deadlines are in February and March. How much unrestricted and predictable revenue did your non-profit receive in 2010?

Regards,
Bill Huddleston
The CFC Coach

www cfcfundraising dot com

proctorconsult - January 17, 2011 at 1:24 pm

One of the most basic things that nonprofits can do is to budget on a cash or modified cash basis. Too many boards review GAAP financial statements, which tell nothing about cash position. When CFOs add additional reports, boards can get overwhelmed. With a cash basis budget, cash is tracked and everyone is focused on cash. It is good to have someone following aged receivables too.

The real dilemma is what to do about late payments. Nonprofits need to recognize that being the banker to the government requires a very good balance sheet, which few have, particularly human services nonprofits. This is a prime area for area nonprofits to form a consortium to present contract terms they need in order to survive. They also need to become hard-headed; many governments have no delivery channels other than the nonprofits; that is market power which nonprofits need to recognize: the governments need them as much or more than the nonprofits need the government.

Regards,
Allen Proctor
http://www.linkingmissiontomoney.com

katebarr - January 17, 2011 at 2:46 pm

Anticipating and managing cash flow is an essential practice for every nonprofit. For small organizations, cash flow projections may be the most important financial report they use. I think that it’s naive, though, to suggest that nonprofits are in the driver’s seat when it comes to the terms of government contracts. Yes, there are situations when it would be smart to decline to take on a contract because of the terms. For many nonprofits though, the state or county is the primary or sole source of payment for essential services. As more states are “solving” budget problems by shifting payments around, the nonprofits are forced to develop new cash flow strategies. As an example, Minnesota has delayed 30% of funding for k-12 education. That means that 152 nonprofit charter schools have had to use reserves (if they had them) or borrow (if they could). The option of “just say no” to the contract terms wasn’t available. As this shift continues, the advocacy forces are building a case, but the state budget problems aren’t going away.

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Raise more money and increase awareness with trusted insight.