• May 22, 2013

Previous

Next

Heavy-Handed Fund-Raising Tactics Alienate Some College Students

October 27, 2010, 11:42 am

Publicizing the names of college students who don’t give to senior-class fund-raising drives has caused a backlash at both Dartmouth College and Cornell University, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education.

For example, a lone Dartmouth senior who did not respond with a gift this year was singled out in a column in the Dartmouth college newspaper and also criticized in a popular campus blog. In response, the student fired off a “testy” e-mail to her fellow classmates.

At Cornell, several seniors said they were turned off by the multiple e-mails and cell-phone calls they received. The contacts came from volunteers who were given the names of seniors who had yet not contributed to the class gift.

“I did not donate in the beginning,” said another Cornell student, a sorority member who was bombarded with e-mails and calls from her sorority sisters. “And the more I was approached by my sorority, the more I was turned off,” she said.

Such tactics can undermine class giving, according to Rob Henry, who has advised student-giving programs for a decade in his job at the Council for Advancement and Support of Education.

Among Mr. Henry’s tips about better ways to inspire class giving: Publicize the names of those who give rather than those who don’t, and avoid 100-percent participation goals to avoid undue pressure on students who do not or cannot give.

This entry was posted in Fundraising, Higher Education. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Heavy-Handed Fund-Raising Tactics Alienate Some College Students

ccasdev - October 27, 2010 at 3:07 pm

Agreed 100% with Mr. Henry. I cannot imagine what these institutions were thinking. They have likely alienated these students for life.

denverbelle - October 27, 2010 at 4:00 pm

Publicizing those who don’t give? Publicly shaming people? Pretty arrogant in my opinion.

bill__huddleston - October 28, 2010 at 6:26 pm

In addition to being a really really stupid idea, does the publishing of names of alumni who have not given violate any privacy or confidentiality regulations at either the Federal or state level?

I’m not a lawyer (and don’t play one on TV) but would be interested in comments from the legal field on this.

Thanks,

Bill Huddleston
www cfcfundraising dot com

P.S. The Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) used to have 100% participation goals but the regulations were modified about 20 years ago- now the highest participation goal that can be set is for 75% participation.

My article about the CFC is in the current issue of Blue Avocado, blueavocado dot org.

  • 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20037
subscribe today

Raise more money and increase awareness with trusted insight.