|
Rick Horton
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2002, 12:03:55 PM » |
|
It's true, there can be "life after leadership." But, like so much of life, there is a real trade-off.
My story is probably not so unique. Started working in the non-profit community after college graduation. I loved the variety of responsibilities as a staff member for a small, local children's museum for five years. Learned a lot about a broad range of duties, from maintenance to animal care to teaching to exhibit design to PR and special events. Did not always love the way that administrative decisions were made and implemented, however, and vowed to find a position that would provide greater management and leadership opportunities.
Moved to a bigger pond (Boston) to help establish a new non-profit environmental organization. Extremely satisfied with setting up systems, policies, and mission-driven programs and still do direct service work. I could continue to work 60-70 hour weeks. After four years, the board and I both thought I was ready and able to succeed the founder as executive director, which I did for over a year, bringing greater financial stability to the organization until the "dark side" of executive directorship drove me from the job. Dysfunctional staff, board micro-management, putting out fires that had little or nothing to do with the organizational purpose or mission. Leaving was painful but necessary.
Fast-forward 11 years. Here I am, still in the non-profit sector but free of the administrative burdens that come at the proverbial top of the pyramid. No one complains (to me at least) about their work schedule or co-workers. As a grant manager, I can still affect positive change in the programs for which I seek support. Married with two young sons, I can leave work with a clear conscience at the end of the day and, usually, look forward to the challenges and opportunities of tomorrow.
The price for this freedom? Executive-level compensation (I am making about 50 percent less than our agency director) and, in an even tougher adjustment for me to make, the loss of executive-level decision making. I've still got the passion for positively affecting institutional change but, as a mid-level manager, change comes much slower, if at all.
Will I ever "direct again?" While it's hard to say, I do know that, if an opportunity were to come my way again, I would have a much better sense of the questions to ask and the conditions under which top-level management would meet both my personal and professional needs.
|