|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
April 20, 2007
Gun-Violence Tragedy Requires Significant Philanthropic ResponseWatching the events at Virginia Tech this week has been heartbreaking. So many young lives, along with decent and honorable people who taught them, obliterated on an otherwise ordinary Monday; a university community in shock; families devastated. Watching the response has also been heartbreaking, but for different reasons. We see the grief counselors. We see the memorial services. We see plans to step up communications and lock down buildings when a shooter is on the loose. We see all the ways people try to cope with tragedy. What we don't see enough of are efforts to prevent it. With the memory of this latest tragedy seared fresh in our souls, philanthropy must step up to meet this challenge. As foundations, we have the resources to commit to important public problems; we have the freedom to take on tough issues; we have the flexibility to respond quickly; and we are, collectively, diverse enough to experiment with a range of solutions. 'Smaller Steps' Gun violence is preventable — not entirely, but substantially. We can reduce the toll, in the same way that, over the last 40 years, we have brought highway death rates way down. As with traffic fatalities, we have no one magic formula. Instead, we Americans have taken many smaller steps (seat belts, air bags, campaigns against drunk driving, child-safety seats) that, together, have saved tens of thousands of lives. With gun violence, however, we have been marching resolutely in the opposite direction. Among our failures:
Then we see this latest tragedy and ask, How could this happen? How could it not happen, when we systematically make it easier for angry and troubled people to get ever more powerful guns, and harder for the police and public-health people to stop the mayhem? Signs of a Shift Some people are stepping up to demand change. Mayors Michael Bloomberg of New York and Thomas Menino of Boston have organized more than 200 of their colleagues to form Mayors Against Illegal Guns to fight outrageous restrictions on gun-trafficking investigations. Law-enforcement officials, on the front lines in this bloody struggle, are demanding stronger policies to back them up. Last week in Chicago, 200 Midwest law-enforcement leaders assembled to find ways to reduce growing gun violence in many of our cities. Their recommendations will be coming soon. The public, too, wants action: A long series of polls, right up to last week's University of Chicago survey, shows broad public support for common-sense gun laws like those listed above. Philanthropy has a role to play as well, one that merits broad discussion at the Council on Foundations meeting in Seattle later this month. Foundations can pay for critical research identifying gun-violence patterns and evaluating interventions. They can support law-enforcement, medical, and citizen groups, as well as others working on the issue. They can give money for local community-mobilization efforts and for state and national policy development. Foundations can support the search for answers. Then, maybe, we won't have to give grants for grief counselors. Ellen S. Alberding is president of the Joyce Foundation, in Chicago.
To discuss this item with other readers, go to http://philanthropy.com/forums/. You may also send a private message to comment@philanthropy.com. Copyright © 2007 The Chronicle of Philanthropy |
|
|
|
||||||||||