Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Opinion

August 07, 2007

Jargon Kills Fund-Raising Appeal

Phrases like “capacity building” and “fostering innovation” are like nails on a chalkboard to Kivi Leroux Miller.

Ms. Miller, author of the blog Nonprofit Communications, says these phrases might make sense in a nonprofit board room. But they turn off those who are reading a brochure or a fund-raising appeal, the author writes.

“Never cut and paste your grant-application language into a marketing brochure for a program and expect it to work as is,” Ms. Miller writes. “You are speaking to two different audiences who need to hear about the program in different words and ways.”

So which phrases should you avoid? Ms. Miller points readers to the Communications Network, which offers a list of foundation and nonprofit jargon.

Needless to say, phrases like “best practices,” “synergy,” and “throughput” are not likely to fit into the, um, “paradigms” of an organization’s “stakeholders.”

What nonprofit jargon words do you think should never creep into conversation or correspondence with donors and supporters? Click on the comments link below to share your nominations.

Peter Panepento

Comments

  1. Prospect, suspect, “secure a gift,” constituents, ...

    — AY    Aug 7, 02:35 PM    #

  2. Phrases used internally, such as “restricted” or “unrestricted” gifts.

    — Flaneuse in DC    Aug 7, 03:34 PM    #

  3. I beg to differ. I am planning donations as we speak and am specifically looking for some of the terminology you suggest eliminating. Am I so different from the typical donor?

    — KinDC    Aug 7, 04:04 PM    #

  4. “bucket,” “drill down”

    — Larry Bostian    Aug 8, 12:57 PM    #

  5. Thanks for the pick-up, Peter.

    To KinDC, I have to wonder how many average donors read the Chronicle of Philanthropy. If a nonprofit’s donor audience is highly sophisticated about the field of philanthropy, I could see your point, but I don’t think that’s true of your average person who gives to charity.

    — Kivi Leroux Miller    Aug 10, 05:03 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.



Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy