Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Opinion

July 28, 2008

If You Give to Save the Children, You Might Also Try Contributing to ...

If you purchase Barbara Ehrenreich’s book Nickel and Dimed through Amazon.com chances are the Web site will suggest you try reading other books on poverty in America, along with similar nonfiction works such as Eric Schlosser’s Fast Food Nation.

Music sites such as Pandora work similarly, providing users with recommendations for new music based on artists they have chosen in the past.

Lucy Bernholz, writing on Philanthropy 2173, wonders whether philanthropy could benefit from such an online recommendation service. Ms. Bernholz says she knows of two organizations that are looking into developing such sites.

But how would such a service work? Ms. Bernholz contemplates the options — and whether such a site makes sense at all.

“Do you base such algorithms on where money goes (the Amazon approach)? Or would you, as Pandora does, attempt to deconstruct nonprofit organizations into types and characteristics and then make recommendations on patterns and similarities? Or is the whole idea absurd, given that giving is both passion-driven and rational in ways that music, movies, and pop culture are simply not? Can you tell something about someone by where they give their money? Can you predict where someone will give by mining data on where they live, what they read, what kind of ice cream they buy, and whether or not they vote?”

What do you think of a recommendation site for charitable giving? How might it work?

Caroline Preston

Comments

  1. I think it wont hurt . Reminding people is ok.
    We do fundraising for UCP,MS and Ancor and they are all short of funds

    — Larry Manhan    Jul 29, 04:21 PM    #

  2. A harebrained idea, as was the decision to waste your readers time with such idiocy.

    — Jeff Steele    Jul 29, 10:03 PM    #

  3. Actually, I think it’s a good idea and possibly the trend for the future. I was at a Not for Profit business class yesterday and they talked about the necessity of teaming – coming together with your competitors to get grants, etc. This idea fit right in with what I was taught.

    — Ellen    Jul 30, 07:41 AM    #

  4. I think this idea could be most useful if it helped direct people to less-known charities in their own community. So if you like Amnesty International, for example, the site could show you some smaller human rights groups operating in your backyard — organizations where you could not only donate funds, but perhaps volunteer.

    — kg, fundraiser    Jul 30, 01:33 PM    #

  5. Good for donors, bad for nonprofits. I wouldn’t be inclined to introduce loyal donors to charities that have a similar mission.

    — mark    Jul 31, 09:16 AM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.



Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy