Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Opinion

October 13, 2008

Reviews of Philanthrocapitalism

The new book Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich Can Save the World is drawing cheers and jeers from a variety of readers.

In The Wall Street Journal, Richard J. Riordan, the former mayor of Los Angeles, writes that a question “hovers over” the book: Why don’t more billionaires use their time and money to fight global ills?

Mr. Riordan writes that it’s not because of greed, but because they do not know how to start in earnest.

“One way to bring these donors into the philanthrocapitalist fold may be through partnerships like those of the [Bill] Gates and [Bill] Clinton variety, because they combine prestige with ‘entrepreneurial’ social goals. Another way would be for these untapped billionaires to take a look at this book’s enlightening analysis of how they might do the most good,” he writes.

In The Financial Times, reviewer John Gapper wonders about the book’s premise during a financial crisis.

“Philanthrocapitalism? Crony capitalism or crooked capitalism, or the end of capitalism feels more like it,” he writes. Yet, he says, as the authors “argue in this thoroughly researched and enjoyable survey of the new rich and their new-found devotion to charity, as it was once known, capitalist do-gooders will always be with us.”

In The Chronicle, Phil Buchanan, president of the Center for Effective Philanthropy, a foundation research group in Cambridge, Mass., writes that the book deserves to be read, but is hollow in its idea that nonprofit groups should adopt the tactics of business.

“My hope is that nonprofit organizations respond to this book with a strong and clear voice—and do not cede ownership of crucial concepts like strategy and performance assessment to anyone,” he writes.

Several readers have responded to Mr. Buchanan’s thoughts at the end of his opinion article.

What do you think of the new book? Are there other notable reviews in newspapers or on nonprofit blogs?

Ian Wilhelm

Commenting is closed for this article.



Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy