Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

Conference Notebook

May 05, 2008


Charities Urged to Measure Their Impact

Nonprofit groups that work on campaigns to change policy or get people to vote must learn how to measure whether they are accomplishing their goals, Eli Il Yong Lee, executive director of the Center for Civil Policy, in Albuquerque, told a conference session.

“We have to focus like a laser on external metrics,” said Mr. Lee, whose center puts together coalitions to promote liberal causes and increase voter participation. For example, a coalition might declare success if 9,000 out of the 10,000 people it targeted in a get-out-the-vote effort showed up at the polls. However, he said, “there’s no way to say what we did caused the turnout.”

He said his organization works with local professors to design “treatment and control” tests to determine whether its activities have produced the desired results. Such tests compare the behavior of a group of people who have been targeted by a particular campaign with a control group of people who have not.

One discovery the center made this way, he said: Sending postcards to remind people where to vote was not effective in turning out voters.

Mr. Lee, a former political-campaign consultant, said his center also encourages coalitions to bring donors into their strategy sessions from Day 1. “In nonprofits, we have this weird culture where we have this wall between donors and groups,” he said, adding that is not true in other areas such as politics.

Coalitions should also assign their members to do the jobs they are best at, not necessarily those they want to do, and learn to respond quickly to changing events, “without going to 20 people to make a decision.”

Suzanne Perry

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2008 The Chronicle of Philanthropy