Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

September 28, 2007

Consumer Group Seek to Change Rules for Nonprofit Hospitals

Community Catalyst — a Boston consumer health advocacy group — is pushing lawmakers to change the standards that govern nonprofit hospitals.

The organization on Thursday said it has sent a recommendation to Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa that Congress require nonprofit hospitals to provide free care equivalent to at least 5 percent of their annual revenue or operating expenses to maintain their nonprofit status.

It also calls on nonprofit hospitals to provide free care for all patients up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level and partial free care for all patients between 200 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level.

Aides to Mr. Grassley have been promoting similar measures in recent months, though Sen. Max Baucus — the Montana Democrat and the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee — has said such reform is not a top priority given the committee’s other agenda items.

What do you think? Should hospitals be required to provide additional care — or are current rules strict enough?

Peter Panepento

Comments

  1. While this may make sense for large, university hospitals that receive large amounts of public and private funding, mid sized non-profit hospitals with smaller donation bases would experience severe distress. Some communities depend on one or two non-profit hospitals. The passed on expenses would unduely burden the public, especially in financially strapped states like Michigan.

    — Felicia    Sep 28, 02:38 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy