|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
September 28, 2007 Consumer Group Seek to Change Rules for Nonprofit HospitalsCommunity Catalyst — a Boston consumer health advocacy group — is pushing lawmakers to change the standards that govern nonprofit hospitals. The organization on Thursday said it has sent a recommendation to Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa that Congress require nonprofit hospitals to provide free care equivalent to at least 5 percent of their annual revenue or operating expenses to maintain their nonprofit status. It also calls on nonprofit hospitals to provide free care for all patients up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level and partial free care for all patients between 200 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level. Aides to Mr. Grassley have been promoting similar measures in recent months, though Sen. Max Baucus — the Montana Democrat and the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee — has said such reform is not a top priority given the committee’s other agenda items. What do you think? Should hospitals be required to provide additional care — or are current rules strict enough? ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Congressional Philanthropy Caucus Ready to Take Off
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
While this may make sense for large, university hospitals that receive large amounts of public and private funding, mid sized non-profit hospitals with smaller donation bases would experience severe distress. Some communities depend on one or two non-profit hospitals. The passed on expenses would unduely burden the public, especially in financially strapped states like Michigan.
— Felicia Sep 28, 02:38 PM #