|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
October 02, 2007 Charity And Presidential PoliticsCan running a nonprofit group actually deter a politician’s presidential hopes? For Newt Gingrich, the answer is yes. The former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives announced last week that he will not seek the Republican Party’s nomination for president, after much speculation to the contrary. While politicos scratched their head over the abrupt decision, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mr. Gingrich bowed out in part because of American Solutions, a nonprofit group he founded that seeks to find technological and bipartisan fixes to the country’s problems. The newspaper quotes a letter Mr. Gingrich sent to supporters on Monday that said he didn’t jump into the race because doing so would force him to give up his role at the organization. “I would have had to absolutely sever all ties with American Solutions to guard against allegations that I was ‘coordinating’ with the group I had help found. This would have left American Solutions, which is less than a year old, without a leader and therefore extremely vulnerable to failure,” he wrote. In addition, Randy Evans, an Atlanta lawyer and long-time friend of Mr. Gingrich, told the newspaper the charity would have created legal problems under current campaign finance laws if Mr. Gingrich had run. Mr. Gingrich is not the only presidential hopeful who has been hampered by involvement with a charity. Democrat John Edwards has been accused of using an antipoverty group he established for political purposes — an allegation he has denied. What do you think? Have presidential politics and finance rules become too onerous for candidates to head a charity? Was Mr. Gingrich’s decision a good one for his organization? Click on the comments link below this post to share your thoughts. ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: IRS Outlines Revisions to New Form 990
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Its a shame that newt isn’t going to run. I believe he would have made a great pres.but even if he can’t run I would have loved to watch him debate every other canadate running thereby forceing them to talk about the real issue’s.
— roger guiles Oct 4, 02:10 AM #