Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

October 02, 2007

Charity And Presidential Politics

Can running a nonprofit group actually deter a politician’s presidential hopes? For Newt Gingrich, the answer is yes.

The former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives announced last week that he will not seek the Republican Party’s nomination for president, after much speculation to the contrary.

While politicos scratched their head over the abrupt decision, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mr. Gingrich bowed out in part because of American Solutions, a nonprofit group he founded that seeks to find technological and bipartisan fixes to the country’s problems.

The newspaper quotes a letter Mr. Gingrich sent to supporters on Monday that said he didn’t jump into the race because doing so would force him to give up his role at the organization.

“I would have had to absolutely sever all ties with American Solutions to guard against allegations that I was ‘coordinating’ with the group I had help found. This would have left American Solutions, which is less than a year old, without a leader and therefore extremely vulnerable to failure,” he wrote.

In addition, Randy Evans, an Atlanta lawyer and long-time friend of Mr. Gingrich, told the newspaper the charity would have created legal problems under current campaign finance laws if Mr. Gingrich had run.

Mr. Gingrich is not the only presidential hopeful who has been hampered by involvement with a charity. Democrat John Edwards has been accused of using an antipoverty group he established for political purposes — an allegation he has denied.

What do you think? Have presidential politics and finance rules become too onerous for candidates to head a charity? Was Mr. Gingrich’s decision a good one for his organization? Click on the comments link below this post to share your thoughts.

Ian Wilhelm

Comments

  1. Its a shame that newt isn’t going to run. I believe he would have made a great pres.but even if he can’t run I would have loved to watch him debate every other canadate running thereby forceing them to talk about the real issue’s.

    — roger guiles    Oct 4, 02:10 AM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy