|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
March 11, 2008 IRS to Require More Disclosure of Officials' SalariesThe Internal Revenue Service will probably alter its definition of which workers should be counted as key employees on the newly redesigned Form 990 informational tax form, a change that would require many groups to list the salaries of more people than they do now. Ronald J. Schultz, a senior technical adviser for the agency’s tax-exempt organizations division, said in an interview that the IRS is looking at expanding the definition of “key employees” for whom charities must report compensation on their Form 990. The form and its instructions are getting a significant makeover for the 2008 tax year. Currently, only workers whose influence extends “organizationwide” are considered “key employees” on Part V of the Form 990, said Mr. Schultz. (Schedule A of the Form 990 asks charities to list the compensation of their five highest-paid workers other than officers, directors, and key employees.) Instructions now say that a key employee is anyone who has responsibilities similar to those of officers and directors and include chief management officials of an organization, such as an executive director. The instructions also say “a chief financial officer and the officer in charge of the administration or program operations are both key employees if they have the authority to control the organization’s activities, its finances, or both.” “We’ve found that many organizations take the position they have no key employees,” said Mr. Schultz, “so in the redesign we wanted to find clarity.” Under the new definition, anyone who has “influence over key activities” would qualify. He also said some charity officials are calling the move the “department head” rule, since heads of departments at hospitals and universities would probably qualify. To make sure the new requirements are not onerous, he said the IRS will probably require groups to list the salaries only of key employees who make at least $100,000. — Sam Kean ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Antipoverty Advocates Urged to Unite to Influence Next President
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
At UT Southwestern Meical Cnter in Dallas where the President earns a $1.12 million salary and uses donor dollars to enhance his lifestyle,the IRS should also look at the “fringes” ,approved and those that some administrators feel they have earned through their personal efforts in fund raising.It is unreasonable not to stay within the $75 gift to donor guideline and use fund raising or large gift as an excuse.Southwestern has given up to an $11,000 gift from Tiffany’s for a $10 million donation.If a guy can give $10 million ( and get a 40%) tax break,can’t he afford his own trinkets from Tiffany’s? The donor should have received a 1099 for the “gift” but did not.Other donor dollars paid for the gift.
— Brent Mar 14, 03:52 PM #