Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

September 08, 2008

Lawmakers Take on College Endowments

Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, and Rep. Peter Welch, Democrat of Vermont, may not typically have a lot in common politically. But they share a common concern over college costs in an era when many higher education institutions are accruing multibillion-dollar endowments.

Mr. Grassley and Mr. Welch are today holding a discussion on Capitol Hill to discuss just those issues, as well as a proposal to require colleges to spend 5 percent of their assets each year.

The problem, according to Mr. Grassley and Mr. Welch, is that colleges and universities are benefiting from their tax-exempt status and the investment returns on enormous endowments at a time when middle-class and low-income families are struggling to pay fast-rising costs of tuition.

In addition to the tax benefits, many colleges and universities receive federal grants for research, Mr. Grassley adds.

“Given the impressive investment returns of college endowment funds, even in years of economic downturn and as tuition has steadily increased, Congress would be remiss if it didn’t question what benefits tax-exempt colleges and universities provide in return for all of the federal benefits they receive,” he said in his opening remarks today.

Eric Kelderman

Comments

  1. Valid point. In order to collect (or perhaps retain is a better word) our tax benefits, all non-profits must provide proof positive that we’re acting in accordance with the responsibilities laid out in our tax-documentation, charters, etc. I eould argue that separate-but-equal treatment is unfair, though – any endowed group benefitting from tax-free status should be held liable to spend a set fraction of its assets each year, as proof of mission engagement.

    — Lissa    Sep 8, 09:35 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy