|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
September 08, 2008 Lawmakers Take on College EndowmentsSen. Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, and Rep. Peter Welch, Democrat of Vermont, may not typically have a lot in common politically. But they share a common concern over college costs in an era when many higher education institutions are accruing multibillion-dollar endowments. Mr. Grassley and Mr. Welch are today holding a discussion on Capitol Hill to discuss just those issues, as well as a proposal to require colleges to spend 5 percent of their assets each year. The problem, according to Mr. Grassley and Mr. Welch, is that colleges and universities are benefiting from their tax-exempt status and the investment returns on enormous endowments at a time when middle-class and low-income families are struggling to pay fast-rising costs of tuition. In addition to the tax benefits, many colleges and universities receive federal grants for research, Mr. Grassley adds. “Given the impressive investment returns of college endowment funds, even in years of economic downturn and as tuition has steadily increased, Congress would be remiss if it didn’t question what benefits tax-exempt colleges and universities provide in return for all of the federal benefits they receive,” he said in his opening remarks today. ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: New Tax-Exempt Groups Get a Pass on Some Paperwork
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Valid point. In order to collect (or perhaps retain is a better word) our tax benefits, all non-profits must provide proof positive that we’re acting in accordance with the responsibilities laid out in our tax-documentation, charters, etc. I eould argue that separate-but-equal treatment is unfair, though – any endowed group benefitting from tax-free status should be held liable to spend a set fraction of its assets each year, as proof of mission engagement.
— Lissa Sep 8, 09:35 PM #