|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
December 09, 2008 Foundations Expect to Spend More to Build on Election Day ImprovementsDespite concerns that high voter turnout would severely strain the polling system, the November presidential election proceeded relatively smoothly, according to a survey released today by the Pew Charitable Trusts. However, some voters reported problems with waiting times, absentee ballots, and inconsistent application of election laws, Pew’s Make Voting Work project, in Washington, said in a statement. Pew has committed more than $20-million since 2000 to fix the nation’s election system, which has been plagued with problems like long lines and machine malfunctions. It said Make Voting Work would spend more than $8-million in 2009 to seek further improvements, in partnership with the JEHT Foundation, in New York. “With momentum building for reform, now is the time to wrestle with where and how to improve our system based on the insights from voters’ direct experience in navigating it,” said Michael Caudell-Feagan, director of Make Voting Work, which is operated by the Pew Center on the States. More than nine in 10 people who voted on November 4 (91 percent) said it was easy to find their polling place, 83 percent said the polling place was very well run, and 75 percent said they were “very confident” their vote was counted as cast, according to a survey of 10,000 Americans sponsored by Pew and AARP. However, the survey, which was conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also found:
The 2009 funding will initially pay for projects to evaluate how early voting and other alternatives to traditional voting at precinct polling places affects turnout, voter satisfaction, security, and administrative efficiency and cost, Pew said. (See The Chronicle‘s article about foundation spending on election projects.) ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Gift-Giving Tips from the IRS
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Should you really trust Pew to serve the Public Interest? The voters of Philadelphia appear to be strongly against Pew’s disgraceful effort to dismantle one of our Nation’s most important cultural landmarks, Philadelphia’s Monticello, The Barnes Foundation, Merion PA. In November 2008, Philadelphia voters turned out in droves and voted for the Anti-BarnesMove candidate for PA Attorney General by a staggering landslide. Still, despite the fact that the voting public has spoken, Pew continues to wantonly and inappropriately push forward with public money to force this bizarre $300mn proposal to move the Barnes Foundation’s Art collection to a Luxury Tower Center City Philly development site, whether the public likes it or not. Americans should be concerned about trusts like Pew who offend the very fabric of the culture they are supposed to be protecting. Dr. Barnes left a will stating that the foundation should not be moved but despite Barnes’ Express statements in his Will (take note all you future Pew donors) Pew is dishonoring Barnes’ testamentary intention. Given the vote, The Barnes Move is not justified under any public interest standard but Pew is still recklessly pushing the expensive and unpopular Move that none of the vast majority of voters in Philly seem to want. Pew is wrecking American Culture on this issue and they should be stopped. The Paul Cret designed Barnes Golden Age Mansion may be a homage to the Cret-designed Flanders Field Cemetery in Belgium and a living memorial to 43 WWI Battle unknowns. Pew, supposedly the great civic communicator, won’t tell you about the importance of Dr. Cret, and, in fact, they are minimizing the grand historical artistic importance of Philly’s Architect, Dr. Paul Cret, so they can take all of the mult-billion dollar art, the heart, from Cret’s specially designed Merion Mansion. Help Keep The Barnes in Merion. Come Visit before Pew destroys the Barnes Foundation as it was meant to be. Come see this important part of American Culture. See, BarnesFriends.org or Artjail.org.
— richard Dec 15, 12:41 PM #