|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
July 16, 2009 House Health-Care Surtax Plan Would Affect Charitable DeductionsWhen House Democrats issued a plan for overhauling the health-care system this week, they proposed a new surtax on wealthy people as a way to pay for expanded insurance coverage. While that tax takes a different form than President Obama’s proposal to limit the value of itemized deductions, including those for charitable donations, its impact would be somewhat similar, according to an analysis by CQ Politics. The reason: The surtax would apply to adjusted gross income, not taxable income — which means itemized deductions could not be used to bring down the tax bill. (In theory, that could dampen the incentive for donating to charity.) The Democrats have proposed that the surtax start at 1 percent on income above $280,000 for individuals and $350,000 for married couples; rise to 1.5 percent for income above $400,000 (couples $500,000); and to 5.4 percent for income above $800,000 (couples $1-million). President Obama has not yet commented on the surtax proposal. He has never wavered publicly from his own proposal to limit the tax breaks for itemized deductions to 28 cents for every dollar spent for couples earning more than $250,000 (individuals $200,000) — down from the current high of 35 cents. That proposal has been controversial because of its potential to depress charitable giving, although many charities support it because they believe they will benefit from lower health-care costs. Senate Democrats are cool to the surtax idea, CQ reports. ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: New Blog Highlights Obama's "United We Serve" Campaign
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Maybe they should look at putting a surtax on the income of middle-income earners who have seen their real income remain flat over the past 2-3 decades! Come on folks, the money has to come from somewhere and the main breaks during the Bush years went to upper-income people. It’s about time.
— PhilanthroJoe Jul 16, 05:24 PM #
Right on, PhilanthroJoe!! Health Care reform will reduce demands on charities far more that a surtax on the wealthy will reduce giving. Let’s get our priorities straight!!
— Fran Jul 16, 07:16 PM #
If you look at all the surveys of high net-worth individuals, giving to non-profits for a tax gain is one of the last reasons people give. I personally know a financial adviser who told me that some of her clients outright lie on their taxes to say they gave money to charity without giving it. All that to say that people have many other ways and loopholes to lower their taxes outside of giving.
— Dave Jul 17, 09:47 AM #