Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Philanthropy Today

April 20, 2007

Biofuels Deal Comes Under Fire at California University

Three months after signing a $500-billion research contract with the petroleum company BP, the University of California at Berkeley faces organized opposition to the deal, reports the Los Angeles Times.

BP, Berkeley, and a third partner, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, agreed in January to establish an institute to develop alternative energy sources and reduce global warming — eventually. In the short term, the institute, which will house dozens of scientists, will develop plant fuel sources and try to perfect the extraction of oil from existing wells.

Critics — who have referred mockingly to “UCBP” — worry that those short-term goals will skew research and that BP will have undue influence over the university. Seventeen faculty members asked the Faculty Senate to demand more university control over the money.

But a majority of Berkeley Senate members said that enough safeguards existed and that they worried that demands on the institute could cause BP to withdraw one of the largest university grants in history.

Read The Chronicle of Higher Education’s coverage of the BP deal and recent controversy over its proposed terms.

Comments

  1. Sad to see another example of buying influence by Big Oil. We in Oxnard and Malibu are rejocing over a landmark decision by the CA State Lands Commission and CA Coastal Commission – who refused to be influenced by BHP Billiton the world’s largest mining company in the world – who wants to bulid a Terminal that would emitt over 480 tons of pollution per year.

    Hopefull Governor Arnold will support Californias and also reject the project.

    And here we are again – having Berelkey submitting to money influence – Has BP and Berkeley thought of supporting Solar – a real clean enery povider.

    Question? Has Berkely thought of using their influence to advice Oil Companies to invest and support Solar etc. – clean energy. Why do Universities supported by our tax dollar – favor the tax payer – who ultimely will pay for the results of your researh?

    — Lupe Anguiano    Apr 20, 05:10 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2008 The Chronicle of Philanthropy