|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
April 20, 2007 Biofuels Deal Comes Under Fire at California UniversityThree months after signing a $500-billion research contract with the petroleum company BP, the University of California at Berkeley faces organized opposition to the deal, reports the Los Angeles Times. BP, Berkeley, and a third partner, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, agreed in January to establish an institute to develop alternative energy sources and reduce global warming — eventually. In the short term, the institute, which will house dozens of scientists, will develop plant fuel sources and try to perfect the extraction of oil from existing wells. Critics — who have referred mockingly to “UCBP” — worry that those short-term goals will skew research and that BP will have undue influence over the university. Seventeen faculty members asked the Faculty Senate to demand more university control over the money. But a majority of Berkeley Senate members said that enough safeguards existed and that they worried that demands on the institute could cause BP to withdraw one of the largest university grants in history. Read The Chronicle of Higher Education’s coverage of the BP deal and recent controversy over its proposed terms. ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Incentives Sought for Artists to Donate Works
Copyright © 2008 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sad to see another example of buying influence by Big Oil. We in Oxnard and Malibu are rejocing over a landmark decision by the CA State Lands Commission and CA Coastal Commission – who refused to be influenced by BHP Billiton the world’s largest mining company in the world – who wants to bulid a Terminal that would emitt over 480 tons of pollution per year.
Hopefull Governor Arnold will support Californias and also reject the project.
And here we are again – having Berelkey submitting to money influence – Has BP and Berkeley thought of supporting Solar – a real clean enery povider.
Question? Has Berkely thought of using their influence to advice Oil Companies to invest and support Solar etc. – clean energy. Why do Universities supported by our tax dollar – favor the tax payer – who ultimely will pay for the results of your researh?
— Lupe Anguiano Apr 20, 05:10 PM #