|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
October 29, 2007 Controversy Over the Nature Conservancy's Land AcquisitionThe Nature Conservancy, one of the world’s largest environmental groups, has purchased 161,000 acres of prized land in the Adirondacks for $110-million, but to preserve it, the group will allow logging, which has drawn criticism in some quarters, reports The New York Times. The 161,000 acres of land was purchased from Finch, Pruyn & Company, a timber business. As part of the acquisition, the conservancy agreed to continue logging to supply wood to the Finch Paper mill in Glens Falls, N.Y., for the next 20 years. Anonymous foresters quoted by the newspaper say the conservancy may cut at least 65,000 tons of pulpwood trees per year for the mill. Additional varieties of trees may also be cut. Furthermore, to pay off debt and high property taxes, the conservancy will, in the near term, sell off land to private owners. Michael T. Carr, executive director of the Adirondack chapter of the Nature Conservancy, says, “Right now, people are not sure if we’re going to cut trees or hug them.” (Free registration is required to view this article.) ![]() CommentsCommenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Princeton U. to Return Artifacts to Italy
Copyright © 2008 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||
What could one effectively comment on such blatant hypocrisy? If the so-called environmental group can even be open about their totally contradictory intentions, who can hope to get through to them? Philanthropy of any kind requires a source of funds from somewhere, but to destroy a large part of the beneficiary itself is “killing the goose that laid the golden egg”, “biting the hand which feeds one”, etc. One can only hope that nature itself will teach these nasty humbugs a good lesson.
— Eugene Yakub Oct 31, 02:10 PM #