Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

October 29, 2007

Controversy Over the Nature Conservancy's Land Acquisition

The Nature Conservancy, one of the world’s largest environmental groups, has purchased 161,000 acres of prized land in the Adirondacks for $110-million, but to preserve it, the group will allow logging, which has drawn criticism in some quarters, reports The New York Times.

The 161,000 acres of land was purchased from Finch, Pruyn & Company, a timber business. As part of the acquisition, the conservancy agreed to continue logging to supply wood to the Finch Paper mill in Glens Falls, N.Y., for the next 20 years.

Anonymous foresters quoted by the newspaper say the conservancy may cut at least 65,000 tons of pulpwood trees per year for the mill. Additional varieties of trees may also be cut. Furthermore, to pay off debt and high property taxes, the conservancy will, in the near term, sell off land to private owners.

Michael T. Carr, executive director of the Adirondack chapter of the Nature Conservancy, says, “Right now, people are not sure if we’re going to cut trees or hug them.”

(Free registration is required to view this article.)

Comments

  1. What could one effectively comment on such blatant hypocrisy? If the so-called environmental group can even be open about their totally contradictory intentions, who can hope to get through to them? Philanthropy of any kind requires a source of funds from somewhere, but to destroy a large part of the beneficiary itself is “killing the goose that laid the golden egg”, “biting the hand which feeds one”, etc. One can only hope that nature itself will teach these nasty humbugs a good lesson.

    — Eugene Yakub    Oct 31, 02:10 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2008 The Chronicle of Philanthropy