Search

Site map

Sections:
Front Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Philanthropy Today

April 29, 2008

National Civil-Liberties Group Takes Over Its South Carolina Affiliate

For the first time in its history, the American Civil Liberties Union has voted to take over one of its state affiliates, reports The New York Times.

The organization voted to take over management of the South Carolina affiliate, which has been plagued by poor management. Its last executive director stole money; it has relied on the financial support of the national organization; and its board is marked by tension.

Some people allege that other ACLU affiliates are also in bad shape but that the South Carolina branch is being unfairly singled out for its criticism of the national organization.

The branch’s representative on the national board, David F. Kennison, fought with Anthony D. Romero, the national organization’s executive director. Furthermore, it was the only affiliate that attached its name to a Web site that is highly critical of the national ACLU, based in New York.

Robert B. Remar, vice president of the ACLU and a lawyer in Atlanta, defended the national group’s decision to supervise the South Carolina affiliate. He said, “South Carolina as a state has a tremendous amount of civil-liberties challenges, and our goal is to make sure there is a strong and viable affiliate to deal with those issues.”

Neil Caesar, president of the South Carolina affiliate’s board, said, “I believe this will truly be harmful to the ACLU and how it is perceived in the state by both our friends and our enemies.”

Previously, two other local affiliates in Texas and Mississippi have agreed to voluntary control by the national ACLU.

(Free registration is required to view this article.)

Comments

  1. I belonged to the Georgia ACLU board for one month: long enough to discover that on major strategic decisions, whilst board members got one vote, staff got 1.5 votes “because we have to implement your decisions.” Strange to find such Orwellian behavior where we least expect it.

    An additional problem is that ACLU boards are political animals: board members who are directly elected serve their own agendas and may come with no skills or governance experience.

    — Nonprofit Professor    Apr 29, 01:24 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2008 The Chronicle of Philanthropy