|
Home Page Gifts & Grants Fund Raising Managing Nonprofit Groups Technology Philanthropy Today Jobs Guide to Grants The Nonprofit Handbook Facts & Figures Events Deadlines Current Issue Back Issues Directory of Services Guide to Managing Nonprofits Continuing-Education Guide Fund-Raising Services Guide Technology Guide About The Chronicle How to Contact Us How to Subscribe How to Register Manage Your Account How to Advertise Press Inquiries Feedback Privacy Policy User Agreement Help |
|
May 29, 2008 Consumers Union Establishes Hospital-Ratings ServiceConsumers Union, a nonprofit organization that publishes Consumer Reports magazine, is establishing a new hospital-ratings service, reports The Wall Street Journal. The organization hopes that the credibility of its magazine’s name (which does not accept advertising) can carry it into the field of health care, where doctors and other providers have balked at some evaluation methods proposed by insurers. The service will include around 3,000 facilities, and consumers will be able to see a graph showing how intensely each hospital treats patients, on a scale from zero for the most conservative to 100 for the most aggressive. Intensity of care is based on time spent in the hospital and the number of doctor visits. The index reflects the hospital’s handling of nine serious conditions, including cancer and heart failure. The new ratings service will also publish the average out-of-pocket cost for doctor visits during the last two years of a person’s life for the nine conditions. Research from the Dartmouth Atlas Project — developed by researchers at Dartmouth College that used data from the federal Medicare program — has shown that more intense care does not always yield better results. And some experts question whether consumers will care about the intensity of care, if there is no corresponding information about whether such care leads to better patient results at a particular hospital. (Free registration is required to view this article.) ![]() Commenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Give and Take: How a Charity's Attempt to Reshape Its Image Failed
Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
|
|
|
|
|||||||