Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

May 30, 2008

Opinion: Diversity Bill a Threat to Charity

Legislation passed by the California Assembly — and due for a vote in the Senate early next month — “poses an enormous threat to philanthropy in this country,” writes Heather R. Higgins, a board member of the Philanthropy Roundtable, in an opinion article in The Wall Street Journal.

In its efforts to promote diversity, the bill would require California foundations with $250-million in assets to report the ethnic and gender makeup of their boards and staffs, the boards and staffs of the charities they support, and the degree to which they are led by or finance projects to benefit minorities.

However, Ms. Higgins says the legislation would result in less money and more bureaucratic headaches for charities served by charitable foundations. What’s more, she says it is a back-door attempt to institute quotas as a means of pressuring charities to meet “diversity” standards out of fear. “The bill creates the opportunity for grandstanding, public-relations shakedowns, and litigation,” she writes.

Read two of the most recent opinion articles The Chronicle has published on the controversial legislation: Mark Rosenman argues why the bill won’t achieve real diversity, and Pablo Eisenberg says it is worth passing.

Comments

  1. Yet another liberal big government grab of personal property and diminution of liberty. This is reprehensible, and Mr Higgins is correct in his assessment. Political Correctness is a major disease that is killing our society.

    — Mitchell Levin    May 30, 04:49 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy