Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help



August 20, 2008

How to Persuade Online Supporters to Give

When people sign up to receive online newsletters and other information from a charity, they usually receive little more than an acknowledgment from the organization for at least month.

Cutting that lag time can produce fund-raising benefits for nonprofit groups, according to a new background paper by Common Knowledge, a San Francisco consulting firm that advises nonprofit groups on online fund raising. (Free registration is required to download the document.)

The paper cites the International Fund for Animal Welfare, which reaped donations from 83 percent more of the people on its e-mail list when they were sent a series of 10 messages that started showing up in their e-mail boxes within two days after they first signed up to receive information.

The messages continued at a pace of two per week for five weeks. Only the last message in the series requested a donation. Those who donated money in response to the final message gave $40.86, on average, or 15 per cent more than the typical gift made by people who had signed up for e-mail alerts but did not receive the quick succession of messages from the animal-welfare charity.

One reason donors responded, says Jeff Patrick, president of Common Knowledge, is that the charity used the series of messages to highlight its most appealing and successful programs. It also included surveys for recipients to fill out and used other techniques to engage readers. “Content and interactivity are critical,” says Mr. Patrick.

Holly Hall

Commenting is closed for this article.




Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy