January 16, 2008
Red Cross to Lay Off Large Numbers of Employees Due to Budget Woes
By Elizabeth Schwinn
Washington
Faced with a budget deficit of $200-million, the American Red Cross, the nation’s largest disaster-relief organization, says it will soon start laying off a large percentage of the 3,000 employees at its national headquarters.
The charity said the deficit is largely the result of expanding its staff too quickly in recent years. But former Red Cross officials say the real problem is that the organization has had trouble raising money at a time when no major disasters have attracted attention to the charity.
The Red Cross, which has an annual budget of $3.45-billion, raised a total of $2.2-billion in 2005 and 2006 to provide relief and recovery aid to victims of Hurricane Katrina, but the charity’s officials acknowledged that contributions have fallen off. Red Cross officials declined to provide specific figures about the status of donations.
‘Lazy’ Approach
Bernadine P. Healy, a former Red Cross chief executive who is now a news columnist, says that a “lazy” fund-raising approach sets the charity up for cyclic, morale-dampening layoffs and other problems. Forced to resign her Red Cross post after clashes with the Board of Governors over how to spend donations after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Ms. Healy is one of five Red Cross chief executives who have left the top job since 1999.
“Their historical approach is that they fund raise in big disasters, and what’s left over is what they use to run the organization,” which operates a blood-collection enterprise and a range of other programs, Ms. Healy says.
“What they need to do is have a major 21st-century campaign and raise money the way universities and hospitals do, which is to go out and raise money for all of their programs,” she says. Unfortunately, she adds, “broad-based fund raising has really never been something the Red Cross has been comfortable with.”
Chief Fund Raiser Leaves
Fund-raising efforts have also lagged after the 2005 departure of J. Logan Seitz, the charity’s senior vice president of development. Kathleen E. Loehr, the acting interim senior fund raiser since Mr. Seitz’s departure, recently left her job and is at home on paid leave, according to Suzy C. DeFrancis, the charity’s chief public-affairs officer.
Ms. DeFrancis says that the fund raiser was not fired or asked to leave and that the charity is now searching for a replacement for Ms. Loehr, who came to the organization in 2001 to focus on soliciting big gifts – ]an approach that was supposed to ease the group’s reliance on disaster-related appeals. Attempts to reach Ms. Loehr at her home were unsuccessful.
The Red Cross has faced mounting criticism in recent years that it spends the money it raises in the wake of a big disaster on other costs. That criticism came to a head after the September 11 attacks prompted an outpouring of donations, more than $1-billion. But the charity was criticized for announcing that it would set aside $200-million for future disasters, a decision it reversed under the glare of negative publicity.
Since then, the Red Cross has allowed donors to earmark their donations for specific disasters, such as the tsunamis in Southeast Asia in 2004 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The charity also created a policy to alert donors when it had received enough money to cover relief efforts. But that approach has caused many disaster operations to suffer because the organization does not have enough money on hand to respond to home fires, local floods, and the other small disasters that form the bulk of the charity’s relief work but fail to generate widespread publicity or big donations.
Scandals Persist
Still, disaster fund raising is only one part of the charity’s current problems, says Frank L. Kurre, a managing partner at Grant Thornton, a consulting company that assists companies and charities with accounting, auditing, and other business issues.
Fund-raising problems, the September 11 flap, and the revolving door for chief executives, he says, are only the beginning of problems hurting the charity’s reputation and making it less appealing to donors. In addition, the Red Cross has been dogged by complaints from victims and relief workers over how it responded to Hurricane Katrina, as well as many other lesser disasters, and Congress last year transferred some of the organization’s disaster-relief responsibilities to government entities, he notes.
“Then you have the most recent scandal with the CEO having to resign,” Mr. Kurre says, referring to Mark Everson, who was fired in November after just six months on the job, when the board discovered his affair with the executive director of a Red Cross chapter. “You look at all these things together and you decide not to give,” Mr. Kurre says.
Although Red Cross officials acknowledge that the charity faces a “very competitive fund-raising environment,” they paint a different picture of the organization, as one that is beginning to recover from its past problems.
Ms. DeFrancis says the pending layoffs are part of a turnaround plan at the Red Cross that began after Congress changed its governing structure last year.
“The board directed us in October to reduce our operating deficit, and gave us until 2010 to accomplish that,” she says.
No firm decisions have yet been made on how many or which people to lay off, says Ms. DeFrancis.
Comments
Commenting is closed for this article.
Previous: William Barron Hilton Tops The Chronicle's Philanthropy 50 List of the Most-Generous Donors of 2007
Next: Climate Change and Poverty Top Google's Giving Priorities
A $200 million deficit doesn’t happen overnight and the idea that fundraising, responsible for only a portion of the organization’s overall income, is at fault—-is preposterous. All of the debacles of the past 4 years have one thing in common: the Bush appointed chair of the board. She and those she has brought in have kept the organization without solid presidential and executive fundraising leadership and driven it into the ground. That they are not being held accountable is astounding.
— B Jan 17, 08:16 AM #
The previous poster is correct about the deficit at Red Cross. The board was responsible for approving a budget knowing eactly what the trends and historic levels of fundraising were. To pretend that this astronomical deficit is a surprise and is due to an unexpected down turn in fundraising is absurd.
The Board and its Chair does not understand the traditional governance role and continues to meddle in the day to day operations of the organization. This is a charity whose role and on going contribution is critical to the nation. It is without leadership, appropriate governance, a vision and an executible plan. They lack the organizational discipline to develop a long term strategy. Organizations thrive when there is inspired leadership in place. Who, with the appropriate skill set, would agree take on the job of righting this ship with the Red Cross in the board’s strangle hold.
— Disappointed Jan 17, 10:28 AM #
There is a misconception that the primary mission of the Red Cross is disaster relief. Looking at past annual reports, in a “normal” non-mega disaster year, the Red Cross spends about 8+ percent of its budget on all disaster services. Most of its multi-billion budget is funded by blood services and first aid classes. The problem is poor management, poor budgeting, poor spending priorities and inefficient use of resources. (Such as flying hundreds of volunteers across the country to assist at recent WA flooding, putting them all up in hotels and paying for their food. There is no shortage of people in Western WA available to perform mostly low skilled services – ARC disaster services has become an expensive and inefficient travel club.) The Red Cross must reorganize its disaster services to achieve far greater efficiencies and to again serve the needs of local disaster victims, which have been neglected after recent mega disasters.
— E Jan 22, 01:16 PM #
The person who posted above does not understand a disaster relief operation. The problem is at NHQ with too many staff.
— T Jan 22, 09:36 PM #