June 10, 2008
Coalition Calls on U.S. Government to Streamline Foreign Antipoverty Efforts
By Caroline Preston
Washington
A coalition of nonprofit leaders, think-tank experts, and academics called on U.S. leaders to streamline the way the federal government fights poverty overseas.
The coalition, known as the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network, said stronger and better-coordinated leadership on foreign aid is urgently needed, ideally under a Cabinet-level Director of Global Development. The role of providing overseas aid is currently spread among 24 different agencies.
“We now have the challenge and imperative to reshape the whole of our foreign-aid system and to craft a nimble, modern, and capable system,” said Gayle Smith, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and a co-chair of the coalition, in announcing the initiative during a meeting on Capitol Hill.
At the event, the group released a proposal for change, New Day, New Way: U.S. Foreign Assistance for the 21st Century.
Its recommendations include the passage of new legislation outlining how the government aids poor countries. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, passed under President John F. Kennedy, remains the law governing international aid.
“While President John F. Kennedy was far sighted, he didn’t quite see the world we live in today,” said Ms. Smith.
The rise of transnational threats such as the international drug trade, global pandemics, the food crisis, and climate change make it critical that the United States modernize how it offers aid, she said.
New Hires
Steve Radelet, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development and a coalition co-chair, said a restructuring of foreign aid couldn’t take place without the hiring of more seasoned experts by the U.S Agency for International Development. That agency is half the size it was during the 1980s, while a third of its most-experienced staff members are eligible for retirement.
In part to fill the void left by USAID, the military has taken on a bigger role in fighting poverty and assisting victims of humanitarian emergencies.
“This is not about moving boxes,” said Mr. Radelet. “This is about rebuilding and re-professionalizing the strength of our development expertise around the U.S. government, which has been badly weakened in the last couple decades.”
He also called for more funds for global-development efforts and the establishment of a Cabinet-level agency for global development. Mr. Radelet said a new department was needed to coordinate aid and secure adequate financial support.
Speaking at the event, Nita M. Lowey, a Democratic congresswoman from New York, said there was growing support among politicians for an overhaul of foreign aid.
But she expressed reservations about establishing a Cabinet-level development agency. Ms. Lowey said such a department might lead to greater separation of foreign-assistance programs from the shaping of foreign-policy agenda.
“I’m concerned that all of the interest and energy in reform will be for naught if the debate becomes one about Cabinet-level agency versus non Cabinet-level agency,” she said. That issue, she said, “can wait.”
Food Concerns
Many speakers pointed to the skyrocketing food prices as an example of why better leadership is needed.
“This thing is the biggest setback in the world’s development efforts for 20 years,” said David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World and a member of the network. “We’re relying on the United Nations and the World Bank to do our thinking for us because there is no one agency in the U.S government that has the firepower to think about this.”
Raymond C. Offenheiser, president of Oxfam America and another coalition member, said the global food crisis revealed how the U.S. government needs to integrate its approaches to trade, energy, and other areas with the fight against poverty.
“Our approach so far has been really modest. It’s been, Let’s try to feed the people who are hungry,” he said. “But this is a large, systemic problem that’s got major structural implications. It needs a big strategy think.”
Comments
Commenting is closed for this article.
Previous: $300-Million Grant Program Seeks to Fix Disparities in Health Care
Next: Foundation Creates Prize for Social-Service 'Superstars'
It’s absurd to think that the government under any administration could “craft a nimble, modern, and capable system” to address increasing foreign aid needs. Government systems are not nimble and they can provoke high levels of suspicion from foreign governments. It is best to leave this work to churches and other NGOs that can flexibly collaborate and meet immediate needs outside of bureaucratic systems. Churches and nonprofits were the charity superstars in the wake of Katrina when the government failed miserably. Why do we want to mess up U.S. foreign aid with a new government institution?
— amandakay Jun 11, 09:29 AM #
How about feeding and housing needy Americans first? Charity begins at home. Why not let private organizations work their magic and demand that American government use the people’s resources to help Americans first? Amandakay makes a great point about bureaucracy. Streamlined and government – yeah, right.
— ec Jun 11, 04:00 PM #