Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

November 21, 2008

Gates Foundation Will Scale Back Grant-Making Plans

By Ian Wilhelm

Due to the financial turmoil in global markets, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation must scale back its plans for grant making in 2009, says Jeff Raikes, chief executive of the foundation.

In a letter Mr. Raikes has written for the organization’s Web site, the Seattle philanthropy will give more money to charity next year compared to 2008, but it will be less than the foundation had expected to award before the economic meltdown hit.

“Nonprofit groups rely on steady funding to carry out their work, but with an uncertain economy and a volatile stock market, funders are having an increasingly difficult time,” Mr. Raikes writes.

“We plan to grow our payout by about 10 percent over our 2008 payout,” he says. “We will, however, reduce the planned growth in our payout. In other words, we will make more grants in 2009 than in 2008, as we have planned, but the increase will be smaller than our original expectation.”

Amounts Not Specified

The letter did not include specific dollar amounts for the fund’s grants this year or for next year.

It also did not say how much the group has lost in assets due to the downturn in the economy.

Heidi Sinclair, a spokeswoman for the foundation, declined to comment on Gates’s grant making next year.

Before the financial crisis, the foundation had said it planned to award $3.2-billion in 2009 as its assets grew thanks to a massive donation by investor Warren Buffett. At the end of last year, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, a separate entity from the foundation that holds its assets, had almost $40-billion, making it the wealthiest philanthropy in the United States.

In addition to decreasing the amount it had prepared to award next year, Mr. Raikes says that he asked employees to find places to trim operational expenses. He also says the foundation’s grant-making priorities — U.S. education, global development, and global health — would remain unchanged and that the fund would continue to support efforts to influence the federal government.

He writes, “advocacy is especially important in tough times. When government officials write next year’s budgets, it may be tempting to cut back on the very programs our grantees care most about. We will continue to advocate, within the legal limits on lobbying, for funding and policies that advance the work we’re doing with our partners.”

Other Foundations

Gates is not the only big foundation facing difficult financial times.

The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, in Menlo Park, Calif., says on its Web site that a decline in assets will force it to cut grant making as much as 7 percent next year.

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has also suffered financial losses, but will increase its grants in 2009.

“In past recessions, we maintained our grant-making level and we intend to do so again now. Our total philanthropy is increasing from 2007 to 2008. We also expect to maintain or increase our grant making in 2009, despite the performance of the market to date,” writes Jonathan F. Fanton, the Chicago fund’s president, in a letter on its Web site.

Read The Chronicle’s article about how nonprofit groups are being affected by stock-market volatility and an article about how foundations are changing their grant making to support people hard hit by economic woes.

Comments

  1. These foundations will be losing the same amount of money due to the devaluing of assets; why not at least give it to charities so it isn’t lost altogether?

    — alex, ks    Nov 24, 03:01 PM    #

  2. While foundations play a strong role in nonprofit sponsorship it is very important that nonprofits look to diversify the risk represented by a disproportionate reliance on a finite set of wealthy donors, and organizations. Organizational financial security is found in operational agility, efficiency, and the cultivation of numerous fundraising sources. We developed KindClicks.com an innovative self sustaining fundraising service for nonprofits. KindClicks uses what Bill Gate referred to as “Creative Capitalism” to build a sustainable fundraising model that enables any person (regardless of their economic situation) to contribute to a worthy cause. Please visit us to consider an alternative choice to traditional fundraising. We do not ask people to make a contribution out of their pocket – we help then earn it.

    — Frank Ramirez    Nov 30, 10:13 PM    #

Commenting is closed for this article.



Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy