January 19, 2009
Opinion: Adding to the Nonprofit Work Force Is a Smart Way to Stimulate the Economy
By Irv Katz
As charitable organizations face unprecedented challenges because of the global economic crisis, it is time for all nonprofit leaders to join forces and become key players in achieving a recovery.
Instead of doing what nonprofit groups traditionally do—seek money for their own causes and programs—we need to focus on solving the problems at hand. What Americans need now are jobs and what charities need are extra hands, so let’s urge Congress and the White House to make charitable employment a key component of the economic-stimulus plan.
Spending government money on jobs at nonprofit causes would accomplish several goals. The government would be financing jobs that paid workers a decent living, money they could use to invest in goods and services in their hometowns. It also would help nonprofit groups deal with the short-term increase in demand for services and a shortfall of private and government money available to hire new workers to meet those demands. And perhaps most important, it would give nonprofit groups an opportunity to train a cadre of workers who can sustain charitable institutions over the long haul as demographic changes make it harder to attract workers.
Workers placed in organizations that focus on arts, conservation, health care, social services, and so many other causes could acquire skills and experience that will be much in demand for decades to come.
The need for workers is especially acute at social-service organizations, which are facing steep rises in demand. Training more people to do this vital work will make it possible for charitable organizations to come closer to caring for all those who seek aid.
In his book, Obama’s Challenge: America’s Economic Crisis and the Power of a Transformative Presidency, Robert Kuttner cites “professionalizing human services” as one of a set of strategies for turning the economy around.
“If we had a national policy that every single job caring for our aged parents and young children was defined as a professional, living-wage job, we could create many millions of jobs in the service sector,” he writes. “At the same time, we could ease the lives of the elderly and give all of America’s children a healthy start, and their mothers and fathers more capacity to be productive workers and nurturing parents.”
President-elect Barack Obama has already said that health care would be a big priority for his administration, and that area too offers many possibilities for a jobs-focused economic-stimulus plan.
If the federal government paid nonprofit health-care organizations to expand their work forces so they could care for more needy people, for example, it would provide new jobs for many low and middle-income Americans, as well as improving care for the nation’s most vulnerable.
Such a program would provide immediate employment to many Americans who have lost their jobs in recent months, aid the growing numbers of people who lack health insurance, and set workers up with the skills they need to work anywhere they want as the job market improves.
America’s recovery will depend on investing in human capital, and if aimed broadly at nonprofit groups, it could build lasting social capital.
Virtually every nonprofit leader can, without disparaging other domestic spending priorities, legitimately make the case that their particular cause has been neglected and requires a several billion-dollar investment to begin to set things right.
But if nonprofit groups want to show why they have a special role in American society, they need to avoid thinking only about their own organizations and their own causes. It would be far more productive for the nonprofit world to seek ways to put people to work than to advocate for government money program by program.
So let’s join together and show government officials how they can provide jobs to millions of people—jobs that will offer a real benefit to our communities.
Irv Katz is president of the National Human Services Assembly, in Washington.
Comments
Commenting is closed for this article.
Previous: Investment Losses Force Foundation to Cancel Poetry Festival
Next: Opinion: Three Ideas for Enlisting Charities to Bolster the Economy
Using bailout funds to help staff non-profits is an excellent way to help non-profits through this difficult time. In addition, boosting non-profit volunteer programs by supporting staff to run these programs can have multiple benefits. As Mr. Katz indicates, bringing staff into a non-profit organization helps the economy in many ways. When that staff are hired to build volunteer management programs, the benefits sore! Despite great public opinion that volunteers can operate without structure, this isn’t the case. Effective volunteer programs need volunteer resource structures in order to create the most impact on the community. As needs rise because of our economic times, volunteers are an excellent source of additional help for these needs. However, we won’t have effective volunteers if investments are not made into the volunteer structures, especially the hiring or retaining of staff with volunteer management backgrounds who can effectively manage the volunteer programs.
— Renee Cardarelle Jan 19, 02:22 PM #
Another bonehead philosopher. What government bureaucrat is going to choose which charities are worthy of the subsidized staff? Give me a break, Irv.
— Jeff Steele Jan 19, 07:02 PM #
I think this is a good idea for anyones community, I’m intrested in starting a non profit organization.
— Andre Harris Jan 21, 12:53 AM #
In theory a good idea, but in practice…After having worked for a non profit health care organization I can tell you that leadership in these orgs are more concerned with themselves than patients or employees. I worked in a 65 bed facility that had 14 vice presidents and a succession of CEO’s who in one two year period redecorated the exec office five times and no less than 30k a shot. The hospice where I currently live has a VP in charge of the website that has not been updated for 2 mos. This is for a twenty bed facility that has at least five fundraisers a year in town. Remove the unnnescessary management at the top and hire workers yes, but keep a close eye on non profits if they get taxpayer money.
— Chuck Heaney Jan 26, 09:50 AM #