Search

Site map

Sections:
Home Page

Gifts & Grants

Fund Raising

Managing Nonprofit Groups

Technology

Philanthropy Today

Jobs

Features:
Guide to Grants

The Nonprofit Handbook

Facts & Figures

Events

Deadlines

The Chronicle in Print:
Current Issue

Back Issues

Sponsored Information
Products & Services:
Directory of Services

Guide to Managing Nonprofits

Continuing-Education Guide

Fund-Raising Services Guide

Technology Guide

Customer Service:
About The Chronicle

How to Contact Us

How to Subscribe

How to Register

Manage Your Account

How to Advertise

Press Inquiries

Feedback

Privacy Policy

User Agreement

Help


The Chronicle of Philanthropy
News Updates

July 28, 2009

Senate Panel Votes to Restore Obama's National-Service Budget

By Grant Williams

Washington

In a break with the House of Representatives, a key Senate subcommittee has voted to provide the Corporation for National and Community Service with about $1.15-billion, approximately the amount that President Obama requested for the agency in his proposed budget for 2010.

The House of Representatives earlier had voted to cut $90-million from Mr. Obama’s budget request for the corporation, which operates AmeriCorps and other service programs.

The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education said in a statement that its bill’s level of funding “puts AmeriCorps on the path” to having 250,000 participants in 2017, a goal approved by Congress earlier this year in the Serve America Act. AmeriCorps has about 75,000 participants this year.

The Senate subcommittee recommended spending $50-million on a new Social Innovation Fund that would provide money for “social entrepreneurs” and nonprofit groups that are developing creative solutions to national and local problems.

The House had voted to spend $35-million on the fund; Mr. Obama had requested $50-million.

The Senate subcommittee also suggested spending $8-million for a new Volunteer Generation Fund and $2-million for a new Nonprofit Capacity Building Program. The House did not include money for the programs.

Commenting is closed for this article.



Copyright © 2009 The Chronicle of Philanthropy